"THE families of three soldiers killed in action since Gordon Brown became Prime Minister have waited at least two years for letters of condolence from him, it emerged yesterday.
Trooper Sadler’s father, Ian, said he received an undated, handwritten letter from Mr Brown on November 17 along with a typed apology from Downing Street permanent secretary Jeremy Haywood.
Mr Sadler said: “Nearly two years later and the PM hasn’t apologised, just his aide. It goes to show what this present administration thinks of our soldiers".
FULL STORY HERE
DO THE RIGHT THING MR BROWN, BRING OUR BOYS HOME AND THEN FALL ON YOUR SWORD.
IT'S THE HONOURABLE THING TO DO.
..
Thursday, 3 December 2009
Sunday, 29 November 2009
Bin Laden - Dead or Alive
Gordon Brown has made fresh calls this week for the capture of Osama Bin Laden.
I think that would be difficult Mr Brown as I have no doubt at all that Osama Bin Laden has been dead for years.
I've always felt it, but there is now evidence to back this up...
READ MORE HERE
Timeline of Events
I remain convinced that Bin Laden has been dead for years.
Who could resist a $50M Reward?
I think that would be difficult Mr Brown as I have no doubt at all that Osama Bin Laden has been dead for years.
I've always felt it, but there is now evidence to back this up...
READ MORE HERE
Timeline of Events
I remain convinced that Bin Laden has been dead for years.
Who could resist a $50M Reward?
Labels:
afghan,
afghanistan,
al quaeda,
bin laden,
gordon brown,
illegal war,
immoral war,
muslim,
osama,
unethical war,
war
Saturday, 28 November 2009
Iraq inquiry: What exactly will Sir John Chilcot's inquiry achieve?
"Sir Christopher Meyer, then Britain's ambassador to Washington, suggested that a deal to invade Iraq may have been "signed in blood" by George Bush and Tony Blair in 2002.
There will doubtless be many more revelations, but what will be done as a consequence?
Sir John has already said that the inquiry is not a court of law and that nobody is on trial.
What, therefore, is its purpose? "
FULL STORY HERE
There will doubtless be many more revelations, but what will be done as a consequence?
Sir John has already said that the inquiry is not a court of law and that nobody is on trial.
What, therefore, is its purpose? "
FULL STORY HERE
Thursday, 26 November 2009
What an Insult to the Dead: Brown Accused of New Iraq Cover-Up!!
"Protocols' on the release of information have given civil servants and witnesses nine separate grounds on which to block the publication of damaging details.
The revelation came on the day that senior civil servants gave damning evidence
to the inquiry which showed that Tony Blair had lied, lied and lied again about the Iraq War.
They said that ten days before the invasion the then Prime Minister knew that Saddam Hussein had no way of using weapons of mass destruction"
Tony Bliar took this counry into an illegal war while the other parties, the UN and the EU turned the other cheek, we all knew that already.
The inquiry just backs it up with evidence.
It has also become clear that Bliar was far from being George Bush's poodle.
He wanted the war as much as Bush for his own personal gain, both power and money.
If Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction then sending our troops into his lair without the proper eqipment was the most immoral thing the nation could do. If Saddam had chemical and biological weapons he would have used them on the advancing British troops. If he didn't have them, which turned out to be the case, the nation had no business invading Iraq.
Saddam Hussein was left dangling at the end of a rope for his crimes, does B liar deserve any less?
FULL STORY HERE
The revelation came on the day that senior civil servants gave damning evidence
to the inquiry which showed that Tony Blair had lied, lied and lied again about the Iraq War.
They said that ten days before the invasion the then Prime Minister knew that Saddam Hussein had no way of using weapons of mass destruction"
Tony Bliar took this counry into an illegal war while the other parties, the UN and the EU turned the other cheek, we all knew that already.
The inquiry just backs it up with evidence.
It has also become clear that Bliar was far from being George Bush's poodle.
He wanted the war as much as Bush for his own personal gain, both power and money.
If Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction then sending our troops into his lair without the proper eqipment was the most immoral thing the nation could do. If Saddam had chemical and biological weapons he would have used them on the advancing British troops. If he didn't have them, which turned out to be the case, the nation had no business invading Iraq.
Saddam Hussein was left dangling at the end of a rope for his crimes, does B liar deserve any less?
FULL STORY HERE
Wednesday, 25 November 2009
Bob Ainsworth criticises Barack Obama over Afghanistan
People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones Bob.
You're a joke, I sincerely hope this latest blunder leads to your resignation.
If I were PM you'd have been sacked months ago, in fact you'd never have been offered the job in the first place.
If the way you ran the M.O.D. wasn't leading to loss of life for our sons it would be laughable.
DO THE HONOURABLE THING AND FALL ON YOUR SWORD!!
Bob Ainsworth sticks his foot firmly in his mouth
You're a joke, I sincerely hope this latest blunder leads to your resignation.
If I were PM you'd have been sacked months ago, in fact you'd never have been offered the job in the first place.
If the way you ran the M.O.D. wasn't leading to loss of life for our sons it would be laughable.
DO THE HONOURABLE THING AND FALL ON YOUR SWORD!!
Bob Ainsworth sticks his foot firmly in his mouth
Former MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove attacks Government over funding of Afghan campaign
"Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6, has launched an attack on the Government for its financing and handling of the military campaign in Afghanistan".
FULL STORY HERE
FULL STORY HERE
Sunday, 22 November 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)